How Does an Attorney Assess an Opioid Overdose Malpractice Case?
An attorney assessing an opioid overdose malpractice case will look at whether the doctor was negligent in prescribing, administering, or managing the patient’s opioid medication. If the doctor’s negligence caused or contributed to the patient’s overdose and related damages, then a malpractice case may exist.
How Medical Malpractice May Contribute to Opioid Overdose
An attorney from Newsome Melton will look at the doctor’s actions when writing the prescription, administering the drugs, or managing the patient’s therapy.
Doctor Should Not Have Prescribed or Administered Opioids
A doctor generally should avoid prescribing opioid medication to a patient with a history of opioid abuse or dependence. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for opioid prescriptions state that doctors should:
- Evaluate patient risks before prescribing opioid therapy
- Review the patient’s history of controlled substance prescriptions
- Use urine drug testing to assess for prescription and illicit drugs
Writing a prescription for opioids (or administering opioid therapy) to a patient with a history of opioid-related problems may be medical negligence. Further, failure to perform due diligence before prescribing for opioid therapy may be negligence as well.
Doctor Poorly Managed the Patient’s Opioid Therapy
Doctors should also carefully manage their patients’ opioid therapies. The CDC guidelines for prescribing opioids say that doctors should:
- Prescribe the lowest effective dose and quantity possible
- Create a treatment plan and discuss it with the patient
- Evaluate the benefits and harms of opioid therapy for the patient within four weeks of beginning therapy
- Choose alternatives to opioid therapy when possible
- Regularly conduct urine drug testing
- Regularly monitor the patient’s controlled substance prescriptions
A doctor who neglects to manage and monitor the patient’s therapy may also be negligent and potentially liable for a related opioid overdose.
Four Elements of Liability for Medical Malpractice
Any medical malpractice case must establish four things to hold the defendant liable for a patient’s injuries or condition:
Duty of Care
All doctors owe their patients a duty of care. When prescribing, administering, or managing opioids, doctors should perform due diligence to minimize risk to the patient.
A doctor who fails to follow the standard of care when prescribing, administering, or managing a patient’s opioid therapy is negligent. We can work with medical experts who can testify about whether the doctor followed the standard of care when prescribing, administering, or managing the patient’s opioid therapy.
The case must also establish that the doctor’s negligence caused or contributed to the patient’s opioid overdose. For example, a medical malpractice case may argue that the doctor’s negligent prescription of opioid therapy without checking for a history of opioid abuse or dependence contributed to the patient’s overdose.
Finally, a medical malpractice case must establish that the plaintiff suffered damages because of the overdose. For example:
- Medical bills
- Lost wages
- Pain and suffering
Get Help with a Medical Malpractice Case from Newsome Melton
If you or a loved one suffered an opioid overdose and you would like to discuss filing a medical malpractice case, call 855-633-2757 for a free case consultation. We can evaluate your case and help you take legal action to recover compensation for your damages.
Legal Information - News Articles
The Law of Medical Malpractice in Mississippi: A Survey of Basic Considerations This article provides an overview of Mississippi medical malpractice law. In the Magnolia State, plaintiffs planning to file malpractice lawsuits ordinarily must first consult with a medical expert to obtain an opinion about whether the case has merit, and also must give 60Read More
Florida Supreme Court Rules Secret Ex Parte Interviews of Medical Malpractice Plaintiffs’ Doctors Unconstitutional On November 9, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Weaver v. Myers, No. SC15-1538 (Nov. 9, 2017). In Weaver, the Supreme Court struck two provisions pertaining to secret, ex parte interviews with plaintiffs’ healthcare providers in connectionRead More