What Is Tort Reform?

Tort reform is any law passed that either changes tort law, or changes the process of seeking justice, but the majority of changes fall under four categories.

Non-economic Damage Caps

These caps limit the large amounts awarded if the damages do not affect economic status. Proponents state this will realign the damage awards with the actual cost of the damage, but opponents claim that it will discriminate against the poor, elderly, and children.

Punitive Damage Caps

These caps limit the amount of economic punishment the courts can order. Opponents state that that if corporations are not punished, then they have less incentive to correct defective products, while proponents counter that that argument implies that the companies have a malicious desire to harm their customers, and that companies will have an economic incentive to market defective products.

Product Liability Curbs

These caps will either impose requirements necessary prior to filing a suit, or will grant some companies immunity from lawsuits. A prime example of a product liability curb is the immunity offered to the manufacturers of vaccines by federal statute. Since the 1960s, no individual can sue a manufacturer of vaccines, he is required instead to enter arbitration to seek damages.

Contingency Fee Limits

Many cases are brought by attorneys who do not offer an up-front fee. When an award is finally obtained, the attorney usually receives one third of the settlement, and this applies whether the suit is actually heard by a jury or settled “out of court.” Proponents state that this would make it unprofitable for firms to file massively inflated claims and would reduce the number of frivolous suits filed, while opponents feel that this will also further exclude poor consumers from access to the legal system.

Tort reform is not new, but as the cost of the legal system rises, a look at how to curb those costs and how to protect consumers and manufacturers alike, as well as the economy as a whole will help to keep this important issue in the forefront of the news, Congress, and state legislatures for many years to come.


Legal Information - News Articles

New Mexico Jury Finds Albuquerque Hospital Negligent; Awards Family $7.75 Million
24 jul
New Mexico Jury Finds Albuquerque Hospital Negligent; Awards Family $7.75 Million

New Mexico Jury Finds Albuquerque Hospital Negligent; Awards Family $7.75 Million Michael Webb waited as long as he could. The pain in his knee was not going away. Finally, in December 2011 he decided to have surgery performed. After the procedure, complications forced Webb in to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the Presbyterian Hospital

Read More
Pennsylvania State Supreme Court May Allow ‘Error In Judgment’ In Medical Malpractice Cases
01 oct
Pennsylvania State Supreme Court May Allow ‘Error In Judgment’ In Medical Malpractice Cases

Last week, it was announced that the state Supreme Court of Pennsylvania would discuss whether or not to overturn a law that allows defendants in medical malpractice lawsuits to avoid prosecution based on “error in judgment”. The decision came as Stephen and Nicole Passarello were granted a new trial after their original lawsuit was dismissed

Read More