North Dakota Surgeon Found Negligent of Severing Woman’s Major Artery; Chenille Condon Awarded $3.5 Million

North Dakota Surgeon Found Negligent of Severing Woman’s Major Artery; Chenille Condon Awarded $3.5 Million

In 2012, one week after giving birth to her fourth child, Chenille Condon was called back to the St. Alexius Hospital for a biopsy on her inflamed lymph nodes by Dr. Allen Michael Booth. The lymph nodes, located in the middle of her chest and in-between her lungs, called for a mediastinoscopy. During the procedure Dr. Booth made a nearly fatal error when he severed Condon’s major artery. According to the malpractice lawsuit, filed nearly three years ago by Condon’s attorneys, the incident caused their client to suffer from a stroke and permanent brain damage. Last month, after a two-week trial in Burleigh Country, the North Dakota jury agreed and awarded Condon $3.5 million.

The lawsuit also claims that Booth performed the biopsy before receiving the results of lab tests that would later show that the inflamed lymph nodes were from a treatable fungal infection and not cancer. These results would have informed Dr. Booth that a mediastinoscopy was unnecessary. When Booth accidentally cut Condon’s innominate artery, which pumps blood to the brain, a second surgeon stepped in to help Booth stop the bleeding. Immediately after the surgery, while in recovery, Condon suffered a major stroke causing partial paralysis, blurred vision, and brain damage. Condon has regained the ability to walk, but she still has trouble moving some of her left side.

“It was a very tragic medical error that took away Ms. Condon’s upward trajectory in life,” said one of her attorneys. “It’s such a large artery, you should never miss it.”

Condon, 35 years-of-age, is slated to receive $2 million for future and past economic losses. She was also awarded $1.5 million for future and past non-economic losses, but the state of North Dakota limits non-economic payouts to $500,000. In addition, lawyers representing the defendants said that they are “reviewing our legal options moving forward,” and may appeal the verdict. Dr. Booth, who was found negligent of severing Condon’s artery, was cleared of charges that he did not adequately educate Condon in terms of the potential risks of the mediastinoscopy.

According to a statement from CHI St. Alexius Health, “As an organization, we fully support Dr. Booth. Providing patients with the very best care is our highest priority each day. We are committed to the people and community we serve.”


Frequently Asked Questions

23 aug
Can Patients Sue For Injuries From Breast Augmentation?

Of the approximately 300,000 American women who have breast augmentation surgery each year, some 240,000 choose the procedure for cosmetic reasons. For the remainder, breast augmentation is a reconstructive surgery following mastectomy or accidental breast scarring. The number of annual breast augmentations makes the operation the most common cosmetic surgery performed in the United Sates,

Read More
If You Prove Your Doctor Violated ‘Standard of Care’, Do You Win Your Case?
19 mar
If You Prove Your Doctor Violated ‘Standard of Care’, Do You Win Your Case?

Proving your doctor violated a “standard of care” is a major hurdle to clear toward winning your medical malpractice case, but it is not all that is required to be awarded damages. You first must prove that your doctor owed you a standard of care to begin with, and you must demonstrate that by violating

Read More