In a medical setting, the duty of care refers to a doctor’s responsibility to their patients. Any actions that do not uphold this duty of care are generally considered negligent. When negligence leads to adverse outcomes for a patient, the doctor can be liable for any damages that result.
A doctor’s failure to uphold the duty of care can give rise to a medical malpractice claim, especially if the patient can prove that the doctor’s failure led to injury or other economic or non-economic harm. For help understanding duty of care and medical malpractice law, contact Medical Malpractice Help today. Our attorneys offer free case evaluations to victims of medical negligence across the U.S. Call 800-916-7333 today.
How to Establish a Duty of Care
A doctor owes a duty of care to a patient when a doctor-patient relationship exists between them. If a person asks for and receives advice about an ankle sprain from a random doctor in an elevator, no duty of care governs that exchange, as the advice was not given within the context of a doctor-patient relationship.
A doctor-patient relationship is established when a patient voluntarily seeks treatment from a particular doctor and enters into an agreement to receive care from that physician. If any of the following facts are true, there was likely a doctor-patient relationship—and thus a duty of care—in the case:
- The patient voluntary selected the doctor for treatment.
- The patient submitted to treatment, care, or examinations by the doctor to address an ailment or medical condition.
- The patient’s treatment by the doctor was ongoing.
A doctor’s duty of care to a patient covers the time during which the relationship existed. If either party terminates the relationship at any point, the doctor does not have a duty of care toward the patient any longer. This is why it is critical for patients to retain all records from their various doctors in case they ever need to prove that a doctor-patient relationship existed.
How to Determine If a Doctor Violated the Duty of Care
To qualify as medical malpractice, the plaintiff must show the doctor breached their duty and violated the standard of care. Proving a violation requires showing that the doctor’s actions—or lack of action—failed to uphold the “reasonable person” standard.
The Reasonable Person Standard
The reasonable person standard compares the doctor’s behavior to what we would expect from another doctor faced with the same situation.
For example, imagine a patient goes to the doctor for persistent abdominal pain. The patient’s condition turns out to be appendix cancer. However, the patient does not discover this until months later, as the initial doctor misdiagnosed the appendix cancer. If another doctor would have correctly diagnosed the cancer and started treatment, the defendant likely violated their duty of care.
Call 800-916-7333 to Schedule a Free Case Evaluation With a Medical Malpractice Lawyer
If you believe your doctor breached their duty of care to you, the legal team at Medical Malpractice Help wants to help you pursue the compensation you deserve for your damages. Our medical malpractice lawyers offer free initial consultations and case evaluations. To schedule an appointment, call our office at 800-916-7333.
Duty Of Care - Frequently Asked Questions
Cognitive functions are not always impaired by locked-in syndrome. Many locked-in syndrome patients can have normal cognitive functions such as reasoning and memory. He or she can hear, think, and see but are paralyzed except for limited eye movements. Each case is unique, but for the most part, locked-in syndrome victims keep their cognitive functions.Read More
If you suspect medical malpractice caused you harm, you may be considering taking legal action. In these instances, many victims of medical negligence wonder: Do medical malpractice cases settle or do they go to trial? Not all medical malpractice claims lead to litigation. Those that do involve a lawsuit do not always make it to aRead More
Duty Of Care - News Articles
Wisconsin Appellate Court Rules $750,000 Medical Malpractice Cap Unconstitutional A lawsuit filed on behalf of Ascaris Mayo was brought before a three-judge panel at Wisconsin’s First District Court of Appeals and they ruled that the state’s cap on non-economic medical malpractice damages is unconstitutional. Six years ago, Mayo, then 51, was brought into the ColumbiaRead More
When Kevin Clanton walked into the Windsor Health Center in June 2008, then just 28-years-old, he could have never anticipated experiencing kidney failure four years later. But after hearing arguments from his lawyers and an attorney representing the federal government, Judge Nancy Rosenstengel ruled that the kidney failure and subsequent transplant could have been avoidedRead More