Informed Consent & Medical Malpractice Law
Informed consent refers to a doctor’s legal responsibility to inform patients of the risks of a medical procedure. Almost all medical procedures carry at least minor risks. Many of these procedures are valid and necessary, despite the small chance of harm or complications. But a doctor still must go over the risks with the patient, allowing the patient to factor them into their decision on whether to move forward with the procedure.
If your doctor did not inform you of the risks of a medical procedure and you suffered harm or complications from the procedure, you may have grounds for a medical malpractice lawsuit even if your injury resulted from normal risk and not because of negligence by the doctor. Call 855-633-2757 today for a free case evaluation with the Newsome Melton law firm.
The Requirements of Informed Consent
Informed consent is based on the idea that patients deserve to be informed of any significant risks before they consent to a medical procedure. The law puts the burden on doctors to make sure their patients understand these potential complications.
When your doctor has you sign a form stating you understand the risks of a procedure, it is because he is trying to remain compliant with the informed consent law. Just because you signed a waiver does not mean, though, that you signed away your right to recover damages if something goes wrong. Informed consent requires a doctor to do more than just elicit a signature from the patient.
If your doctor did not explain the risks of a procedure in detail, making sure you understood each one before moving onto the next, you could have grounds for a malpractice suit even if you signed a form consenting to the procedure. A lawyer can help you build your case.
How to Show a Doctor Violated Informed Consent
In a medical malpractice lawsuit, a doctor is judged to have violated informed consent if the following conditions are present:
- A reasonable doctor in the same situation would have disclosed the risk
- The risk was significant enough that you, the patient, may have opted not to consent to the procedure had you known about it.
Your medical malpractice lawyer can bring in expert witnesses to play the role of a reasonable person. These experts will be medical professionals who can review the evidence and testify about whether they would have gone over the risks that your doctor skipped.
Your lawyer also can bring up alternatives to the procedure that you may have chosen if your doctor had informed you of the risks. This can strengthen the claim that you would have made a different decision had you possessed the right knowledge.
When Informed Consent Does Not Apply
In rare circumstances, doctors are exempt from some of the provisions of informed consent. To give an example, when a patient gets wheeled in who may die quickly without emergency intervention, the doctor is not expected to review the risks of a potentially lifesaving procedure calmly.
To Receive a Free Medical Malpractice Case Evaluation, Call Newsome Melton at 855-633-2757
The Newsome Melton legal team wants to help you with your medical malpractice claim. For a free consultation and case evaluation, call 855-633-2757 today.
Informed Consent - Frequently Asked Questions
You can sue for future medical expenses in a medical malpractice lawsuit. But to win these damages, you must prove they are legitimate, just as you do with any compensation you seek in a civil tort lawsuit. In other words, you must convince a judge and jury that you are more likely than not toRead More
You should file a lawsuit as quickly as possible after a birth injury because you do have a limited time to do so. The clock begins ticking when the injury occurs. If you wait too long, you will not be able to file for medical malpractice. The statute of limitations establishes how long you canRead More
Informed Consent - News Articles
The son of an Alabama woman who passed away in 2005 from a brain hemorrhage was recently awarded a $5 million judgment after a jury declared that the doctor that had been treating his mother was guilty of negligence. Dr. Frank Gillis had been treating Florine Bryant for atrial fibrillation, which is the most commonRead More
On February 24, 1998, the year after graduating from high school, Jason Simcakoski joined the United States Marine Corps. Simcakoski served for four years and was honorably discharged in 2002 after sustaining a significant injury to his head. After his service was over he began suffering from anxiety attacks and sought treatment at the TomahRead More