Loss of Consortium & Medical Malpractice Law
Learn the definition of loss of consortium in the context of medical malpractice law.
Loss of consortium refers to the inability of a medical malpractice victim to have a healthy marital relationship following their injury. Many people use “loss of consortium” interchangeably with “loss of sexual pleasure” or “loss of sexual function,” but the term is more comprehensive to refer to any loss of a spouse’s ability to fulfill the expectations of a marital relationship.
In the context of a medical malpractice lawsuit, loss of consortium is considered a non-economic damage, meaning it is not tied to actual financial depletion. Even though the loss of consortium does not involve monetary loss, you are still eligible to recover compensation for it, though many states cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases.
A medical malpractice lawyer can go over the rules in your state and what to expect. Call 855-633-2757 for a free case evaluation.
Examples of Loss of Consortium
The most common example of a loss of consortium and the one that comes to most people’s minds who are familiar with the term is the loss of sexual intimacy within a marital relationship.
To give an example, suppose a man goes in for a vasectomy, and the doctor ruins the procedure and costs the patient erectile function. Since he and his wife can no longer enjoy the sexual relationship they had before, he has grounds to recover loss of consortium damages in a malpractice lawsuit against the doctor.
More Than Just Sexual Intimacy
In a situation such as this one, the damage to the couple’s relationship might go deeper than the loss of the physical act of intimacy. The husband, for example, may develop depression over his inability to perform. The onset of the husband’s depression may cause the relationship may deteriorate further, and the husband may stop fulfilling other expectations of a spouse, such as providing love, care, and affection. This also qualifies as a loss of consortium.
Economic vs. Non-Economic Damages
Since it does not involve monetary depletion, loss of consortium is a non-economic damage. Damages that are economic in nature include items such as medical expenses, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, and prescription drug costs — things that either cost money or prevent you from earning money you otherwise would have received.
Most states do not cap economic damages in medical malpractice cases, but they do place limits on non-economic damages to keep malpractice insurance and health care costs down. A medical malpractice lawyer can explain the rules of your state and help you recover the most in non-economic damages you can.
Call 855-633-2757 for a Free Medical Malpractice Case Evaluation with Newsome Melton
The medical malpractice lawyers at Newsome Melton want to help you recover damages for injuries resulting from a health care provider’s negligence. We are eager to speak with you and get started on your case. For a free case evaluation, call our office today at 855-633-2757.
Loss of Consortium - Frequently Asked Questions
Opioids are often prescribed to treat pain, but they also come in illicit forms. These powerful painkillers, derived from the poppy plant, release chemicals that work through the nervous system to relieve even the most serious pain. However, they also activate the reward centers of the brain, producing feelings of euphoria. As such, opioids are
Read More
You can often find out if a doctor has been sued for malpractice before. At Medical Malpractice Help, we support the rights of patients to learn as much as possible about a doctor before agreeing to treatment. Our medical malpractice lawyers can help you conduct research on your doctor to determine if they have a prior
Read MoreLoss of Consortium - News Articles
Toward the end of 2009, after having trouble conceiving, Danielle Madden Buck and her husband decided to try in-vitro fertilization. The procedure worked and Buck became pregnant with triplets. Her doctors, however, advised her that carrying triplets was dangerous and that twins would be more likely to survive than three infants. Buck took the recommendation
Read More
In 2004, Spokane resident Darlene Turner visited Dr. Nathan Stime for a physical after she had been feeling considerably ill, and the physician determined that she had terminal cancer. While that news must have been both shocking and horrifying for Turner, it was presumably even more shocking when she learned that Dr. Stime’s diagnosis
Read More