Florida House of Representatives Approves Medical Malpractice Bill

Florida House of Representatives Approves Medical Malpractice Bill

Last week, Florida’s House of Representatives approved a business-backed bill that will shift the state’s test for the admissibility of expert witness testimony from the Frye standard to the Daubert standard.  Approximately 28 other states and the federal courts use this tougher standard, which critics say would pose a challenge for patients who pursue medical malpractice claims.  According to the Orlando Sentinel, the House passed the Bill with a 77-38 vote and is now awaiting approval from Governor Rick Scott.

The Florida Supreme Court has consistently adhered to the Frye standard, which allows for the admissibility of expert opinions based on whether the principles or techniques presented have gained general acceptance in their particular field.  The new bill, however, places new limits on the kind of expert witness testimony that can be used in a medical malpractice lawsuit.  For instance, the limits imposed by the bill require medical experts to be from the same field as the physician who is being sued.

Critics of H.B. 7065, such as plaintiffs’ attorneys and the Florida Justice Association, argue that the bill creates challenges for malpractice victims to seek justice.  Senator Maria Lorts Sachs explains that the “Daubert standard could have a narrowing effect on a citizen’s access to having a day in court.”  Supporters of the bill, however, insist that the bill will help attract health care professionals to the state and also reduce medical malpractice costs.

A key component of doctor-patient confidentiality might be compromised with the new bill, which includes the adoption of ex parte communications.  According to the Orlando Sentinel, outside communication between “defense lawyers and doctors who are not connected to the lawsuits but who have treated the plaintiffs” can occur without the presence of the plaintiffs’ lawyers.  Although supporters of the bill say that this change could expedite the case, critics are concerned about patient rights to confidentiality.

Barring an unlikely veto from Governor Rick Scott, the new standard will go into effect on July 1.


Frequently Asked Questions

How Is A Brain Stem Stroke Diagnosed?
21 feb
How Is A Brain Stem Stroke Diagnosed?

Doctors typically diagnose brain stem strokes via imaging tests, the most common being magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and angiogram. Because a brain stem stroke is a legitimate medical emergency, the sooner one of these tests gets performed and a diagnosis rendered, the better the patient’s chances of long-term recovery. If a brain

Read More
How Dangerous Is Alcohol Withdrawal?
03 jun
How Dangerous Is Alcohol Withdrawal?

Alcohol withdrawal can be extremely dangerous and even deadly. Many people do not view quitting the regular, long-term use of alcohol as difficult or deadly as quitting other addictive drugs cold turkey, but it can be just as deadly — or even more so in some cases. It is important that all patients and their

Read More