NC Court of Appeals Reinstates Negligence Lawsuit Against Duke Surgeon & Hospital

NC Court of Appeals Reinstates Negligence Lawsuit Against Duke Surgeon & Hospital NC Court of Appeals Reinstates Negligence Lawsuit Against Duke Surgeon & Hospital

NC Court of Appeals Reinstates Negligence Lawsuit Against Duke Surgeon & Hospital

In 2012 Marjorie C. Locklear, then 75 years old, suffered a heart attack. After consulting with Dr. Matthew S. Cummings at the Southeastern Medical Center of Lumberton, she opted for cardiovascular surgery. According to a lawsuit filed on behalf of Locklear, Cummings and the staff at Southeastern did not secure her to the operating table causing her to fall during the surgery. The lawsuit claims the incident occurred “while the Plaintiff was opened up and had surgical tools in her.” Her lawyer told the court that the fall caused Locklear to suffer from a concussion, double vision, a jaw injury, and bruises down the left side of her face and body.

The lawsuit was initially dismissed in 2016 because of a legal procedure error, but the North Carolina Court of Appeals has reversed the dismissal and the case will be heard. Early last year, Superior Court Judge Greg Ball ruled that Southeastern did not receive lawful notice of the lawsuit and the Court of Appeals upheld that ruling. But a panel of three judges reinstated the suit against Dr. Cummings, the Duke University Health System, and the Duke University Affiliated Physicians, who managed and ran the cardiology department at Southeastern.

The charges against Duke and Cummings were originally dismissed because Locklear and her lawyers filed for negligence, not as a medical malpractice lawsuit. They did not go through the correct channels or follow the legal procedure for a malpractice lawsuit yet it appeared to be a malpractice case. This may have been done purposefully to avoid the tort reform law that caps malpractice damages in North Carolina. A law that prevents many law firms from being able to take on similar cases.

Judge Robert N. Hunter Jr. and Judge Ann Marie Calabria voted to allow Locklear to sue for ordinary negligence and not malpractice. Judge Philip Berger Jr. disagreed and voted for upholding Ball’s original ruling that the case should’ve been filed as a medical malpractice lawsuit. If the majority had agreed and the suit was deemed a malpractice case, as Duke and Cummings argued for, the lawsuit would have been dismissed because Locklear and her lawyers did not follow the correct protocol.

Due to the 2-1 decision by the Court of Appeals the case will now go to the North Carolina Supreme Court.


Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice Settlements
18 aug
Medical Malpractice Settlements

No one likes to be a victim. This includes individuals who may have been injured or harmed due to medical situations. You become a victim of medical malpractice when you encounter certain medical misconduct. Every year, approximately 80,000 individuals have cause for a medical malpractice lawsuit. Interestingly enough, only one out-of-eight of these individuals pursues

Read More
What Is The Basis For Most Medical Malpractice Claims?
23 jul
What Is The Basis For Most Medical Malpractice Claims?

The basis for most medical malpractice claims involves four elements: duty, breach, injury, and damages. To qualify as medical malpractice, the following details must be true: The doctor or healthcare provider had a duty to uphold the standard of care for their patient; The doctor or healthcare provider breached the standard of care; The patient

Read More