Surgeon Found Negligent for Performing Unneeded Operation; Jury Awards Pennsylvania Woman $625,000

Surgeon Found Negligent for Performing Unneeded Operation; Jury Awards Pennsylvania Woman $625,000 Surgeon Found Negligent for Performing Unneeded Operation; Jury Awards Pennsylvania Woman $625,000

Surgeon Found Negligent for Performing Unneeded Operation; Jury Awards Pennsylvania Woman $625,000

In April 2013, Natisha Almeida went to the Doylestown Women’s Health Center, located in Doylestown Pennsylvania, because she was feeling pressure in her pelvis. Based on an ultrasound by radiologist, Dr. Paul Adelizzi, it was determined that Almeida had a mass in her pelvic region that should be removed. After a CT scan was performed, Dr. Mark Silidker confirmed that he also saw the mass. But both Adelizzi and Silidker expressed some doubt and recommended further testing. However, Dr. Tuan A. Le, Almeida’s surgeon, allegedly performed the pelvic surgery without any additional tests. This action led to Almeida filing a medical malpractice lawsuit.  Her case was recently tried before a jury, resulting in an award of $625,000.

Based on the lawsuit filed in a Pennsylvania federal court, when Almeida, now 31, was operated on Le discovered that there was no mass at all, which Dr. Le had believed was the size of a “potato.” Almeida alleged that due to the unnecessary surgery she has lost the ability to have a child. The lawsuit also claims that the surgery, performed on May 10, 2013, left permanent scarring and caused pelvic adhesive disease, which eventually required Almeida to have her fallopian tube removed.

The Pennsylvania jury that found Dr. Le negligent did dismiss the charges against Adelizzi and Silidker because they both recommended further testing to verify their conclusions. Larry Caputo, a doctor and an expert witness for the plaintiff, said that he believed the doctors were looking at the anterior wall of air in her bowel. Another opinion is that they were looking at a shadow. Dr. Le wrote in his report after the operation that there was no sign of a mass and no damage in Almeida’s ovaries, or her fallopian tubes.

“I was very impressed by how rapt the jury was and how attentive they were to the evidence from both sides,” said one of the lawyers representing Almeida. “They were really trying to do the right thing and figure this out. I said in my closing argument that regardless of the outcome of the case, I know my client received a fair trial given how attentive the jury was.”

Dr. Le reportedly offered Almeida $100,000 to settle the lawsuit, but when she asked for $400,000 he declined. A federal judge in Pennsylvania upheld the verdict of $625,000, saying that the damages were, “reasonable and bears a rational relationship to the evidence presented at trial.”


Frequently Asked Questions

Is A Cervical Polyps Misdiagnosis Considered Medical Malpractice?
25 aug
Is A Cervical Polyps Misdiagnosis Considered Medical Malpractice?

Tumors of the uterine cervix are known as cervical polyps, sometimes these polyps can be growths as opposed to cancerous tumors. The cervix is an important organ as it is what connects the uterus to the vagina. Polyps in the cervix are most often benign; however, there are instances in which these growths are a

Read More
Opioid Overdose Death Rates
05 apr
Opioid Overdose Death Rates

Opioid overdose death rates have skyrocketed in recent years. Between 1999 and 2017, nearly 400,000 people died from an opioid-related overdose. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), illegally manufactured fentanyl was responsible for the majority of overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids between 2016 and 2017. Addictions to drugs such as illegal

Read More